However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 3, 2020, the Defendant reported in C building D, which is the Defendant’s residence at the Gunsan City B, around 2:10 on October 3, 2020, and 112 on the premise that “the female f, who was dispatched to the site, takes a bath to the Defendant’s wife G, who was the reported person by the Ethical slope F, belonging to the Gunsan Police Station Ethical F, who was called to the site, and took a bath to the Defendant’s wife, and assaulted the Defendant by taking a part of the F, by taking the head into custody, and taking part in the f, such as launching.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties such as handling of 112 reports by police officers, prevention of crimes, investigation and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and H:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to voluntary accompanying reports, internal investigation reports, caps photographs, investigation reports (related to the table of 112 reported case) to the accused case interfering with the performance of official duties;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act provides that the nature of the crime committed by a police officer performing legitimate duties in itself

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;