When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 8, 2014, at around 23:40, the Defendant received the report of a fire accident in Jincheon-gun B, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, and demanded the victim D and the victim E, an assistant, who is the circumstances belonging to the Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, the Defendant sent the report of the fire accident to the victim, “I am off the vehicle inquiry parked at the fire site, ask the owner to find the owner.” However, on the ground that the victims do not hear the horses of the Defendant, the victims expressed that “the victims are spacks, spacks, police, spacks, spacks, spacks, and spacks, and other residents, including F, etc., who were at the scene of the fire site.”

Accordingly, the Defendant insultd the victims openly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and E;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;