On August 17, 2012, 2012, the Defendant borrowed KRW 23 million from Korea (ju) social services by Alciciciciciciciciciciciciciiiiiiiiiiiiation of the victim at the agencies of Hamian Samsung Motor Vehicles D in Nam-gu Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, and secured the mortgage on August 21, 2012, with the mortgagee of the EM5 motor vehicle jointly owned by the Defendant as the victim, and with the claim amount of KRW 10,500,000,000.

On April 2014, the Defendant provided F with a vehicle that became the object of the foregoing mortgage for debt repayment and concealed it to F, thereby hindering the exercise of the victim’s rights.

"2016 Highest 3068"

1. On April 2013, 2013, the Defendant, who committed early April 2013, 2013, was a police officer with phone call from the victim G to the police officer, and was engaged in tegrative work to take over and take over I clothes store in the H department store in Gyeonggi-do.

If an investment of KRW 40,00,000, which is half of the subscription amount, is made, the profits will be made after the operation.

“.....”

However, in fact, the defendant did not receive the above clothing store, and did not attempt to acquire the above clothing store, and even if he received the investment from the injured party, he thought that he would use the money to repay his personal debt, so there was no intention or ability to pay the principal of the investment fund and the profit.

As a result, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 5 million from the victim, via the post office account (Account Number: J) in the name of the Defendant on April 8, 2013, KRW 30 million around the 15th of the same month, and KRW 40 million in total from each remittance around the 22th of the same month.

2. On May 2013, 2013, the Defendant, who committed the first patrol officer, called the Defendant’s phone to the said victim G on May 2013, 2013, can see the profits from selling back by posting the phone to the said victim G.

If acquired capital is invested, profit shall be provided.

“.....”

However, the defendant is the above store.