In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

1. On May 18, 2018, at the entrance of Dana, located in Jeju Island, Defendant A, at around 20:45 on May 18, 2018, the Defendant assaulted F’s chest by force by force on the part of the reporter, while the slope F, who was dispatched to the site after receiving 112 reports that he suffered assault and assaulted the reporter.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

2. Defendant B, at the same time, at the same time and place as indicated in the preceding paragraph, reported that A, who was working as mentioned above, was arrested in flagrant offender from G, etc. due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and attempted to attack G, etc., and that “B,” the Defendant, “Is the Defendant,” “Is the Defendant,” and assaulted G’s chest part by force due to both hand, and was arrested in flagrant offender due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and was transferred to the Jeju Police Station E zone in Jeju City, Jeju, Jeju, and was charged with assaulting G’s parts and the right bridge part and the right bridge part of G due to the defect. On the same day, he was arrested in flagrant offender due to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and was transferred to the office on the floor of Jeju Police Station E zone in Jeju, Jeju at around 20:52 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 report processing and arrest of flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Related photographs and CCTV images;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is not good, but the accused is led to confession and reflect. Defendant A did not have any record of the same kind of crime other than twice a fine in 2010, Defendant B did not have any record of the same crime, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct.