When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CM car.

On September 20, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car on September 11, 2014, and led the front road of the Taeyang-gu Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, to the front road from the ridge.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well with the signal, etc. and to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with its signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and was driven by the victim D(55 years old) who was left to the left pursuant to the new sub-paragraph in the opposite part of the direction of the course when he was due to the negligence in contravention of the signal, and received the front part of the Eststya-si as the front part of the car of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, suffered injury to the above victim D, such as satisf, etc., in light of the cathere in need of treatment for about two weeks, from the victim FF (the age of 67) who was on the part of the Defendant’s driver’s math, the injury, such as the bones of the bones of uniforms and bones necessary treatment for about six weeks, and from the victim G (the age of 19) who was on the part of the victimized taxi, the Defendant suffered from the injury, such as the left satf

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Statement of victim of D;

1. Accident site and vehicle photograph;

1. Signal frequency table;

1. (Dismissal) Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the severe penalty for the summary order shall be determined to be excessive in light of the fact that the spouse of the defendant is the victim, the injury of other victims, the fact that the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance is covered, the health status, gender, age, and past experience of the defendant);

1. Article 70(1) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.