2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant was liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages incurred by the tort, since the Defendant abused the Plaintiff by assaulting the Plaintiff on the part of the Plaintiff, i.e., holding the Plaintiff’s face up to a single time, such as he sits over the Plaintiff’s face on the part of the Plaintiff, etc., and did not have any open address within a scarcity, etc., at the D office located in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 31, 2014, and the Defendant was liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages incurred by the Plaintiff.

Judgment

As to the Plaintiff’s assertion, according to the health team, Gap evidence No. 1, the facts charged by the Defendant, as alleged in the Plaintiff, that he/she committed an assault against the Plaintiff, were indicted as the Youngcheon District Court’s Young-gu Branch 2014Ma372, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3,00,000 from the above court on January 6, 2015.

그러나 한편, 피고가 위 형사 제1심판결에 불복하여 항소(춘천지방법원 2015노46)한 결과, 2016. 5. 26. 항소심 법원이 ‘원고가 피고의 멱살을 잡고 원고 쪽으로 잡아끌다가 넘어진 것인지 피고가 원고의 멱살을 잡고 피고를 뒤로 민 것인지 명백하지 않을 뿐만 아니라, 원고의 상해부위에 비추어 원고의 상해는 피고가 원고와 함께 넘어져 원고를 위에서 덮치게 되면서 피고의 무릎이나 손 등으로 원고의 갈비뼈 부분을 찧게 되어 발생한 것으로 보인다’는 등의 이유로 위 제1심판결을 파기하고 피고에 대하여 무죄를 선고한 사실, 검사가 위 판결에 불복하여 상고(대법원 2016도8640)하였으나 2016. 8. 25. 검사의 상고가 기각된 사실은 당사자 사이에 다툼이 없거나 이 법원에 현저하다.

Therefore, it is not sufficient to recognize that the above facts and the statements of Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 12 alone constitute an injury to the plaintiff by assaulting the plaintiff at the time of the plaintiff's assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

Therefore, it is based on this premise.