2. Although there are some favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant first committed a crime, is a criminal under confinement, has a deep depth and reflects his mistake through confinement, that the defendant received 2.7 million won damage from the victim'sO, and the profits acquired by the crime of this case are not significant, and that the defendant living in the course of supporting the defendant's fright and frighting, it appears that the crime of this case occurred due to living conditions in the process of living. However, each of the crimes of this case in collusion with his assistant and takes over the passbook, which is the means of access, in the process of taking over the money through the so-called fishing crime, because the amount of damage is extremely high, the crime of this case is committed closely and systematically against many unspecified persons, it is difficult to arrest and punish the principal offender, and there is no need for the defendant to participate in the crime of this case as well as the fact that the defendant's physical harm is actually recovered and there is no need to participate in the crime of this case, and there is no need for the defendant to participate in the crime of this case as a relatively unfair reason.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.