However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 6, 2012, the Defendant, from around May 2006, when working as a delivery engineer at D located in E in E in E in Sungsung City, stolen the engine error amounting to KRW 300,000, in addition to the amount instructed by the victim E, by loading the engine error amounting to KRW 300,000 on oil, and selling it to the customer, from that time, until December 28, 2012, the Defendant stolen the engine error amounting to KRW 5,210,000 in total, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table, from that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment (Overallly, Selection of Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and community service order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One month to six years of imprisonment;

2. Scope of the recommended sentences for the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] thie-general larceny [the scope of the recommended sentence and the scope of the recommended sentence] mitigated area (4 to 10 months of imprisonment] (the scope of the recommended area] mitigated area: No penalty surcharge shall be imposed;

3. Determination of sentence shall be made in the same manner as the order within the recommended range, taking into account the fact that the defendant was wrong, the victim did not want the punishment of the defendant, and the defendant did not have any record of punishment for the same kind of crime;