Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

At around 10:00 on July 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) connected the string part of the string vehicle owned by the Defendant with the string part of the string vehicle; (b) forced the Defendant to operate a road of approximately 2 km from Magpo City to D in front of the dwelling area; and (c) forced the Defendant to drive a road of about 2km from Magpo City to D road; and (d) forced the Defendant to move back the string part and the body part by forcing the Defendant to move back.

As a result, the defendant abused the body by using the arrest vehicle to inflict an injury on the body.

Summary of Evidence

1. A statement made by the witness E in this Court;

1. Statement of statement E prepared by the police officer;

1. Statement of the comprehensive details of vehicles;

1. Determination as to the assertion by each video accused and defense counsel of the F posted language and each photograph

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant, from April 2017, combines the dogs that were raised from around 2017 to the vehicle, has been running at a speed of 10 km a speed of 10 km in the city, and the dog has been running well through a slider, and has not abused the dog only in the same way at the time of the instant case.

2. The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court at hand, namely, ① the Defendant is not towing a dog on the top side of the 2005 rocketing-Pacific vehicle, but towing and carrying two meters long after the front of the above vehicle. Considering the vehicle width and length of the above vehicle, it seems difficult for the Defendant to observe the opening condition of the vehicle from time to time, ② if the witness E finds a dog towing the vehicle in a short state by the above vehicle, it would have already been driven from the opening floor to the body. Accordingly, this is followed.