However, for Defendant B, D, E, and F, respectively from the date of this judgment.

Defendant

A, B, C, D, E, F and victim G (n, 19 years of age) are middle school dongs and social friendlys.

From around 02:00 to around 05:00 on April 11, 2013, the Defendants entered the victim as the toilet at the above main point on the ground that the victim had expressed his desire to and made a false statement to the ordinary Defendants, and that the victim got a different from the Defendants.

Defendant

C는 피해자에게 “너 우리 부모님에 대해 욕설한 거 기억나느냐”라고 말하며 손바닥으로 피해자의 얼굴과 머리를 수회 때리고 피해자의 머리채를 잡아 흔들어 넘어뜨리고 발과 무릎으로 피해자의 몸통을 각 1회 걷어찼다.

Defendant A used the victim’s face on the floor of hand to 10 times, and Defendant B used the victim’s face by putting the victim’s head debt on her hand, Defendant D used the victim’s face at 2,3 times with her hand, Defendant E used the victim’s face on her hand, and the victim’s head was faced with the wall by breaking the victim’s breath with her hair, and Defendant F used the victim’s head on her hand. Defendant F used the victim’s face on 2 occasions with her hand and her head debt flicking the victim’s head.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put up the body of the inner wall, the body of the pelpel, the body of the pelpel, the body of the pelpelto, and the body of the pelto.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation results, a complaint, and a written diagnosis of injury;

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the defendants who choose to commit a crime;

1. Defendant B, D, E, and F of the suspended sentence: a number of reasons for sentencing in Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code.