A. As to Defendant B’s share 1800/8370, June 2019.

A. 1 Establishment of a mutual title trust relationship) Each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each land of this case”) in the separate sheet, and in some cases, “instant land” is deemed to be “instant land.”

Around 2016, with respect to the share of 3090/8370 of the Plaintiff, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Plaintiff, ② the name of the Defendant B with respect to the share of 1800/8370 of the shares, ③ the names of the Defendants C and D, and ④ the remaining 2160/8370 shares, and ④ each share of the Defendant E with respect to the share of 60/8370 shares. However, in the case of the share of 3090/8370 of the land of this case, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Plaintiff’s father F, around January 27, 1970, unlike the remainder of the land of this case where the registration of ownership transfer was completed due to inheritance by division as of January 27, 1990, the Plaintiff had occupied the land of this case from around 197 to around 13, 2018 to around 197, ③ the Plaintiff’s share of this case.

B. On March 2, 2016, Defendant B filed a lawsuit for partition of co-owned property on the instant Nos. 1 and 2 land against the Plaintiff, Defendant C, D, and E (this Court 2016Gahap938). The cause of the claim was changed due to the claim for ownership transfer registration based on the cancellation of a mutual title trust, and January 12, 2017 against the Defendants of the said lawsuit. On March 2, 2017, Defendant B won a favorable judgment against the Defendants of the said lawsuit (the judgment received in confession or confession as to the Plaintiff 6570/8370 shares, Defendant C60/8370 shares, Defendant D60/8370 shares, which were 660/8370 shares of each of the instant lands, on March 2, 2017.