However, the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. From the beginning of November 2014 to September 17, 19, 200, the Defendant: (a) operated an officetel commercial sex acts under the name of “F” under the name of “G”, “H”, “H”, etc. and had an unspecified customer find commercial sex acts by having him/her take advantage of the sex of customers by taking advantage of KRW 90,00 or KRW 120,00 in the price of commercial sex acts; (b) he/she acquired at least five times, five hundred and fifty times, five times, five times, five times, five times, five times, five times, five times, five times, five times, five times, five times, five times, or more, or more, or more; and (c) he/she acquired commercial sex acts under the name of “F”.

2. Defendant B, around September 19, 2016, around 519, received KRW 50,00 of the sexual traffic price from A and performed the act of similarity in the manner of putting a sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s sexual son’s around 519

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of I, J, L, K, M, or N;

1. Documents to be attached (advertisement comments on advertisements, records of post-recording conversations), accompanying documents, photographs, etc., and accompanying documents (the search, etc. of additional sexual traffic rooms);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Defendant B who selects imprisonment: Selection of fines, etc.;

1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes (Defendant B);

1. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act 1. suspended execution (Defendant A);