2. The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

1. Defendant A

A. On November 20, 2014, Defendant A posted his phone to the victim D (52 tax) by his mobile phone, Defendant A stated, “I am friencing and throw away from Gwangju, friencing, friencing, friencing, friencing, friencing, hhing, and kncencing the car by leaving the car in a tight and knifecing manner.”

Accordingly, the above defendant threatened the victim.

B. Defendant A sent the victim’s cell phone text messages, such as “packer flap, flap,” at the time of the above paragraph (a) below the date and time, Defendant A sent the victim’s cell phone text messages.

Accordingly, the above defendant threatened the victim.

2. Defendant B, around November 20, 2014, on the ground that the victim D does not take part in the part of Defendant A, one of his/her own difficulties, Defendant B is required to be able to send back to slids with his/her frame when he/she gets into his/her house. E is omitted from our house.

그 오빠 감옥에서 엊그제 나왔어

I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I.

These types of voice messages remain in the victim's cell phone phone.

Accordingly, the above defendant threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1-A.]

1. Defendant A’s legal statement of the witness D in the police interrogation protocol of the police interrogation protocol against Defendant A, and Defendant A’s accusation protocol (Defendant A and the defense counsel asserted that Defendant A’s phone call to the victim D to the effect that there was no intimidation, such as Defendant A’s criminal facts No. 1(a).

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., the following circumstances: (i) D consistently made the statement from the investigative agency to this court as stated in Section 1-A of the crime committed by Defendant A in telephone.

The above statements are stated, and there are other circumstances where the above statements will be false.