In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

1. At around 03:15 on June 6, 2017, Defendant A and other customers who had been disturbed in a singing practice room on the road located in the north-gu Sing practice room at the port of delivery. Defendant A and the Defendant were in the process of drinking with the police officers assigned to the police station E box in the port of delivery (25 years old) who were sent to the singing practice room after receiving 112 reports, on the ground that he fell in the process of preventing the occurrence of the disturbance, and, on the ground that, on the other hand, Defendant A and the Defendant were able to take a bath at the large interest of “spath, spath, spath and spath, spath, spath, spath and spath,” and f in the process of preventing the disturbance of the police officers assigned to the singing practice room.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted F who is a public official in the 112 reporting dispatch duty, and obstructed the execution of his duties.

2. Defendant B’s attempt to arrest Defendant B as Defendant B’s flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties, such as the date and time, at the place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, F’s attempt to arrest Defendant B as Defendant B’s flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties, including paragraph 1 of the above paragraph,

What is why is you leep? The bruth theory was expressed in a large sense, and F was pushed down and pushed down on several occasions.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted F who is a public official in the 112 reporting dispatch duty, and obstructed the execution of his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and the Defendants who choose a sentence: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Penalty Penalty)

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: (a) the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act consisting of the Defendants’ mistakes; (b) the Defendants have no record of being punished for the same kind of crime; (c) the degree of violence; and (d) the Defendants’ age, environment, sex, motive for committing the crime; and (e) the circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances after committing the crime, shall be determined as per the text.