A. The reasons why the court should explain the cited part of this case are as follows.

As stated in Paragraph 3, the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revised by closing or adding the judgment of the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to the following Paragraph 2, and the judgment of the plaintiffs' preliminary claims except the plaintiff X added at the court of first instance shall be made in the case of 1955 students among the plaintiffs.

first of all, the decision is examined in paragraph.

Except for the judgment of the court of first instance, since it is the same as that of the plaintiffs, the corresponding part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Part 1) The 3th 1 and 2th 1st 3th 1 and 2th 5th 2 of the judgment of the first instance court as “attached Table 2”; the 60th 10 and 11th “the retirement age” was “the 60 years from January 1, 2013 to 60 years”; the 4th 4th “Defendant’s Trade Union” was “the 5th 9th 9th 9th 9, and the 3th 9th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 8th 1st 9th 1st 9th 1st 13th 9th 1st 13th 6th 3th 196th 202, “the 1st 5th 9th 9th 1st 2012 3th 1st 2012.”

However, even according to the plaintiffs' assertion, the plaintiffs' retirement age is.