When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 11:00 on March 11, 2015, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03g of psychotropic drugs in the Defendant’s house located in the window D, a single psychotropic drug, in a single-use injection machine, and administered them in a way of injection into the left arms following the growth course.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (the market price of a mert cancer and an additional collection charge);

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1), and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. under the relevant Acts on criminal facts;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although there are no circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same kind of crime with the same reason for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and was committed again, it is more appropriate to give the defendant the last opportunity to practice a short sentence within society rather than having him serve for a long time, by sentencing a sentence of punishment, when considering the following factors: (a) the defendant, as well as his wife, voluntarily surrenders to the police station; (b) the defendant and his wife, showing a strong intention to engage in an investigation; (c) the defendant has no same history in addition to the crime subject to suspended execution and the instant crime; and (d) the instant crime is a single simple medication.