beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.10.19 2015고단3096

변호사법위반

Text

The accused shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment of innocence.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a registered credit service provider that operates credit business under the trade name, “Company G,” located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Seoul, with the trade name of “F,” around November 23, 2010.

around February 28, 2011, the Defendant acquired 8,925 non-performing loans (principal of bonds: 12,063,128,565 won) from 8,925 Won for non-performing loans, and acquired 123 non-performing loans (principal of bonds: 838,638,189 won) from 24,820,759 won for non-performing loans and acquired 273 non-performing loans (principal of bonds: 173,245,039 won): 4,615,092 won for non-performing loans; 12,000,000,000,000,000 won for non-performing loans; and 123,000,000,000 won for non-performing loans; 270,013,51,536,536,15,165,14,15,000 won for non-performing loans.

On December 5, 2014, the Defendant filed an application for an electronic payment order with the purport that “A Co., Ltd. G” and “H 217,717 won is repaid” by accessing the electronic litigation system at the above G office of the said Co., Ltd., Ltd., and filed an application for payment order claiming KRW 1,277,465,147, total sum of 185 times as shown in the annexed list of crimes, from that time to January 21, 2015.”

Accordingly, the defendant acquired another person's right and carried out his right as a business by means of litigation, etc.

2. Article 112 subparagraph 1 of the Attorney-at-Law Act(hereinafter referred to as "the punishment provision of this case") prevents harm to the people's interests in legal life and ensure the fair and smooth operation of the civil judicial system. It prevents a person whose name is stated in the law from taking a lawsuit, conciliation, settlement or other means by using the court to take over another's rights for business purpose or without compensation and implement it.