However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the Busan Coast Guard D police station located in the Busan Coast Guard C on September 20, 2015; (b) at the Busan Coast Guard D police station located in the Busan Coast Guard C, and (c) at the Busan Coast Guard D police station, in relation to the use of violence to the women, the Defendant was arrested in the act of violence by the police officer H, Ha, etc., who was called the above police officer, and went to the above police box, and did not reveal the identity after having been arrested in the act of violence by the police officer H, Ha, etc., who was called the above police officer, was asked for the personal information of the above police officer; (c) the police officer was killed, and (d) the she was able to go to go back to the police box while going to the police box, and tried to go out of the police box, and (d) the police officer continued to go out of the police box.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is a police officer, has prevented the execution of legitimate duties concerning the investigation and police box service of the above I and H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of each police statement protocol to G, I, and H

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do141, Apr. 1, 201