When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, on February 2, 2016, was in the next table table in the “D” restaurant operated by the Victim C in Silung-si B at Silung-si on February 2, 2016.

E on the ground that he was fluoring and fluoring for himself;

C C. C. C. C. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. B. C. C. C. and C. B. B. B. C. C. C. 30 minutes of C. B. B. C. C

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of statutes on the site photographs of the case

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and selection of fines (such as the confession and reflection of the accused, and the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the accused, etc.);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.