A. On June 2012, Defendant H entered into a contract for removal of the entire interior and exterior of the rooftop from J 1 to D (hereinafter “instant construction”) with K operating J, and agreed to pay the instant construction cost in the account of a national bank account (Account L; hereinafter “instant account”) in Defendant I’s spouse, Defendant H.

B. For the instant construction, Defendant H entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiffs on each of the construction mid-termrs owned by the Plaintiffs, and entered into each of the instant construction contracts with the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each of the instant contracts”). Defendant H decided to settle the price under each of the instant contracts on a daily basis.

C. Under each of the contracts of this case, the Plaintiffs leased their equipment to Defendant H during each of the construction periods listed below, and at the same time performed subcontracted construction works from Defendant H, and each of the accrued rents and construction costs is as follows:

Plaintiff

The construction period and construction cost (cost) A from August 13, 2012 to the same year

8. 16. 2,700,00 B B From June 18, 2012 to the same year

7. From August 15, 2012 to the same year

8.16.11,400,000 C From August 6, 2012 to the same year

8. 6.6.800,000 D from August 13, 2012 to the same year

8. 2,550,00 E on August 8, 2012 to the same year

8.12. 3,400,00 FF from August 9, 2012

8. 2,500,00 G from August 11, 2012 to the same year

8. For Defendant H, 17.3,400,00 [based on recognition]: The facts in dispute against Defendant A who is deemed as confession under Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act: The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Gap evidence 2-1 through 10, Gap evidence 3-1 through 5, Gap evidence 4-1 through 4, Gap evidence 5-1 through 5, Gap evidence 6-1 through 4, Gap evidence 6-1 through 4, Gap evidence 7-1 through 2, Eul evidence 8-1 through 2, Eul evidence 8-1 through 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments as to Gap evidence 3;

2. According to the facts of the above recognition of the claim against Defendant H.