beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.15 2017노3725

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

. there is room for understanding;

① The Defendant, who was a professor of sexual intercourse D, wished to enter the United States of America from May 29, 201 to August 14, 2012.

G’s natural teaching of sexual intercourse E has been provided more than three times a week for two hours each time, and G has paid 600,000 won per tuition to the defendant.

② On April 2012, E received notification that he/she passed a scholarship in the U.S. Lare, and G issued the Defendant the same model of the same model as he/she was on August 14, 2012, when he/she received the last individual teaching prior to departure from the U.S.

③ On August 14, 2012, the Defendant sent and received the following Kakao Stockholm messages with G:

The defendant may be aware of how to give too large gifts to him.

ㅠㅠ ”라고 하자, G가 “ 오래오래 잘 사용해 주시면 고맙겠습니다.

Lately above, health care needs to be taken into consideration.

^^* ”라고 답변하였다.

이어 피고인이 “ 아까 놀라고 당황스러워서 별 말씀도 못 드리고 ㅠㅠ 돌려 드려야 하는 거 아닌지 ㅠㅠ ”라고 하자, G가 “ 일년 여 동안 행복했었습니다.

Many things have changed and are difficult to follow their values, and it is necessary to think that they expressed their matches.

I then think I will see today.

“The answer was made.”

④ In addition, G also includes the following: (a) the Defendant has donated the natural mountain basin on May 25, 2012; (b) the Jeju mountain basin on August 20, 2012; and (c) the natural mountain dust on September 20, 2012. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23908, Sep. 20, 2012>

G, in the investigation of the D University Human Rights Center, recording and listening to his or her father’s music was born, and actually developing his or her father’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

3) G calls from E at the court of the court below at the end of August 2011, 201, stating that “Non (Defendant D) is the son’s son.”