beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.06 2016고단2948

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인들은 2016. 3. 27. 05:00 경 용인시 기흥구 관곡로 95 소재 기흥 구청 택시 승강장 앞 도로에서, D, E와 함께 부근 술집에서 술을 마시고 나온 후, E가 그곳에 주차되어 있는 피해자 F(46 세) 의 자동차에 침을 뱉었다가 피해 자로부터 훈계를 듣자 화가 나, 피고인 A은 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 수회 때리고, 피고인 B은 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 수회 때린 다음 머리로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 들이 받고, 피고인 A은 위와 같은 폭행으로 땅바닥에 넘어져 있는 피해자의 머리채를 붙잡아 일으켜 세우고, 이어 피고인 B은 주먹과 발로 다시 넘어진 피해자의 몸을 수회 때리고, D은 이에 가세하여 발로 피해자의 몸을 수회 찼다.

As a result, the Defendants shared with D and caused the injury to the victim in need of treatment for about 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A criminal investigation report ( analysis of images taken on the site of the case and attaching cases);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by photographing an injury photograph or a cell phone camera at the scene of the assault;

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment, etc.

1. The Defendants under suspended execution: The grounds for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] general injury [the person subject to special mitigation] [the person subject to special mitigation] in the mitigated area of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act] [the defendants' decision of sentence] is made in consideration of the circumstances leading up to the crimes, violence and the degree of damage resulting therefrom, circumstances after the crime was committed (which was agreed with the victims), the defendants' anti-sex attitude and previous conviction relation (which could have been committed against the defendants as violent crimes), and all other circumstances of sentencing as indicated in the records and