If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On August 24, 2014, at the convenience store located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around 20:05, the Defendant: (a) put one of the two mobile phones in Samsung Galleland 500,000 won in his own Australia in the market price owned by the victim, which was set up on the weller by the victim D, using the gap in which the victim D was set up at the locker; and (b) continuously took advantage of the gap in which the surveillance of the convenience store employees was neglected, the Defendant stolen 50,000 won of the market price managed by the victim E in the display stand, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement prepared by D or E;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for the sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to be taken into consideration the following factors: (a) the Defendant committed the same kind of crime during the period of suspension of execution; (b) the Defendant recognized all of his/her mistakes; (c) the victims do not want to punish the Defendant; (d) the Defendant currently lives in prison upon cancellation of the suspended execution; (b) the Defendant’s age, sex, intelligence and environment; (c) the relationship to the victims; (d) the motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime; and (e) the punishment as ordered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.