도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On April 7, 2015, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act by Jeju District Court.
1. On April 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 22:50 on April 18, 2016, the Defendant driven C Cocoon vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.130% at the section of about 200 meters from the front of the CU convenience store in the Gu-Eup, Jeju-si to the front road of the CU convenience in the same Ri.
2. On May 23, 2016, the Defendant driven a Dmotor bicycle without obtaining a driver’s license in the state of alcohol alcohol level of approximately 0.169% from the front road to the front road of about 45 km of the same Eup, if he/she is a hives of the hives of the hives located in the Pyeong-ro route of the Gu, Jeju-si, Jeju-si, at around 22:25 on May 23, 2016.
Accordingly, the defendant, who violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.
On February 28, 2005, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Jeju District Court on February 28, 2005, and on April 7, 2015, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On April 18, 2016 and on May 23, 2016, the Defendant was under the control of driving under the influence of alcohol.
【Criminal Facts】
On June 14, 2016, at around 20:27, the Defendant driven an EKan-Pon car without a driver’s license from approximately 2 km section from the front of Filido cafeteria, which is in the ordinary agency in Jeju, to the coast of 1422-3, to the 1422-3.
Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking driving twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.
Summary of Evidence
"2016 Highest 1169"
1. The defendant;