채무부존재확인
1. A traffic accident on April 3, 2018, which occurred at the front intersection of the Busan Jung-dong Busan Central Police Station located at the Busan Central Police Station around 23:30.
1. To judge both the principal claim and the counterclaim. A.
Facts of recognition
(1) On April 3, 2018, around 23:30 on April 23:3, 2018, the 4rd line road and the Yanando road that combines the Busan District Court of the Republic of Korea and the Southern District of the Central East East East-dong, which are located along one-lane of the Defendant Driving’s non-registration of 125cc mets, going through one-lane from the Busan District Fire Station in front of the Busan District Fire Station, and the Southern District Fire Station in front of the Busan District Fire Station, and one-lane of the opposite direction. Accordingly, the Defendant suffered from the closure frame of the inner part, the tension, the tension and tension of the detailed part of the items known, and the Damp typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ.
(2) The point where the instant accident occurred is the lane where the taxi is running, i.e., the excursion ship/ferry in the intersection where the Defendant was running.
(3) The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity with respect to the above taxi.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, Gap evidence 4-1 to 10, Gap evidence 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings
B. As to the Plaintiff’s assertion that there was no negligence on the occurrence of the instant accident, the Defendant asserted that the instant accident was the wind that the Defendant exceeded the center line due to force majeure since it was difficult for the Defendant to temporarily secure the view due to negligence, and that the instant accident was caused by an excessive operation, and thus, sought payment of KRW 9,818,170 in total, including medical expenses, daily income, and consolation money, etc., due to the instant accident caused by the counterclaim.
살피건대 위에서 든 증거들에 나타난 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 이 사건 사고 당시 C은 전조등(하향등)만을 켠채 자기 차선을 따라 진행 중이었고, 위 교차로는 약간 좌로 굽은 도로였기 때문에 반대차선으로 마주 진행하던 피고에게 택시의 전조등 불빛으로 인하여 어떠한 시야장애도 없었던 점, 피고는 면허 없이 진행하는...