Nevertheless, the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case has erred by misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the court below acknowledged that D, an employee of the Defendant’s singing room, first of all, pays 12,00 won for alcoholic beverages by the credit card of the customer, provided the customer with his money at the nearby convenience store by selling and selling beer per day at the time of the above singing, and D did not pay attention that D should not sell or provide alcoholic beverages to customers at the time of singing, and according to the above facts, D, an employee of the Defendant, violated the rules of practice by selling or providing alcoholic beverages to be observed by a singing room, and therefore, the facts charged of this case against the Defendant, an employee of the singing room, is sufficiently convicted. Accordingly, the judgment of the court below consistent with this conclusion is justified, and it did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as alleged by the Defendant, or by misapprehending the legal principles.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.