On October 4, 2014, the above vehicle was driven by around 07:00, and at the speed of about 10-20 km from the right side of the front road of C at the time of C interest to the right side of the front road of C at the speed of about 10-20 km per hour on the one-lane road.

Since there is a signal, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was negligent in proceeding so and received the front part of the victim's D driving E-Rad vehicle, which is left to the left in accordance with normal signals in the opposite part of the vehicle faced with madle, and received the front part of the vehicle in front of the left part.

Thus, the defendant suffered injury to the above victim, such as salt ties, tensions, etc., in need of approximately three weeks of treatment, and injury to the same passenger F of the same vehicle, such as salt dump, tensions, etc., which require approximately three weeks of treatment.

Judgment

According to the records of this case, the following facts are recognized.

① In a summary order subject to review with respect to a person requesting a retrial, this Court rendered that “the Defendant sustained the injury of the victim’s E-Rad Rad Rad Rad Rad Rad Rad Bad Bad Bad Bad Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Ha

The summary order of KRW 1,50,000 was issued on October 28, 2014 by recognizing the guilty of the facts charged in the indictment of “.”

(2) The Defendant, who was dissatisfied with the above summary order, filed a request for formal trial, but proceeded with by the court 2015 and 513.