beta
(영문) 대전지방법원논산지원 2020.07.23 2018가단1974

토지(임야) 인도

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff is a right holder of 462/793 square meters of D forest land 793 square meters (hereinafter “instant forest”) in Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, and the Defendant is an owner of 691 square meters of land adjacent to the said forest land (hereinafter “instant land”).

[Reasons for Recognition] 1 and 2 of Evidence A 2-1 and 2

2. The plaintiff's assertion asserts that the defendant has a duty to deliver the (A) portion of the ship that connects each point of the attached Form Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, and 4 to the land of this case in the order of priority.

As the land of this case is owned by the defendant, the request for extradition based on the premise that the plaintiff is owned by the defendant is without any reason, and the above part of the land of this case should be included in the forest of this case, which is owned by the plaintiff for the purpose of the survey. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the above part of the land of this case was incorporated into the land of this case by arbitrarily changing the cadastral map and extinguishing a part of the cadastral map of the forest of this case into the land of this case.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.