When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 22:27, 2018, the Victim C’s Operation D, which had been drinking in a hump, was trying to take one math from the hump to the hump; (b) the Defendant calculated the Defendant’s hump’s hump to the hump to the hump to the hump to the hump; and (c) made the hump to the hump to the hump to the hump to the hume; and (d) made the hump to the hump to the hump to the hump to the hume; and (d) made the hump to the hump to the hump to the hump to the hume; and (d) made the hump to some customers, including the hump to the hump to the hum.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on the spot F and wire telephone);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;