However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 21, 2020, at around 10:58, the Defendant: (a) opened a door that was parked in the front road located in Gwangju Mine District B; (b) opened into the vehicle; and (c) stolen, with approximately KRW 58,00,000, cash owned by the victim E, which was kept in the said place.

2. On June 1, 2020, the Defendant attempted to larceny, at around 14:02, by opening a string of a G vehicle parked in the front of the Gwangju Mine District F, and entering the vehicle into the front of the G vehicle located therein. The Defendant attempted to take Handbags and vegetables, etc. due to the Defendant’s unfluence of the market price, which is the victim H, located in the relevant place. However, the Defendant failed to bring about a theft due to the Defendant’s unfluence of the market price, but failed to bring about a theft.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of H and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as field photographs, to the investigation and confirmation of CCTV closure photographs (specific amount of damage caused by leakage);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62(1) (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2001Da14488, Apr. 1, 201