However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On August 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 23:30 on August 23:30, 2017, and around 5 holes C’s singing practice room in the Southern-gun B, and (b) at the time of carrying with the branch, the Defendant, upon receiving 112 a report and receiving a check from E during the process of carrying out the police box in the territory of the police box of the Barrananan Military Police Station called, “this weather is called, e.g., e., e., e., e., e., g., e., e., g., e., g., e., e., g., e

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the police officer's 112 reporting and crime prevention duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Taking into account the following factors: (a) confession and reflection of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) contingent crimes; (c) agreement with police officers subject to the crime during the proceeding of the instant trial; and (d) absence of any record of punishment for the same kind of crime.