beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.05.09 2015고정2612

폭행등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Go fixed 2612] Defendant B, at around 21:50 on August 28, 2015, at the passenger waiting room in Daegu-gu, Defendant B expressed a desire to take a bath for the victim A (n't, 44 years of age) while taking assault from the victim A, Defendant B put the victim's face at the end of the metal material, and put the victim two strokes during the treatment period at the time of the head.

[2015 High Court Decision 2613]

1. On August 9, 2015, Defendant A committed the crime of August 19, 2015, from around 19:10 to 19:40, to around the F station in Daegu E, Defendant A was considered to be due to the reporting by the Korean judicial police on the fact that “the Defendant was placed in a prior cleaning room by the Korean judicial police” in front of the guidance counter in the F station in Daegu E, and that the victim H, the head of the Earar’s service team, deemed to be due to the reporting by the Korean Vice Minister, during the process that the victim H, etc., as the head of the Earar’s service team, deemed to be “G, D, and G, and Scars, all of which are the same.”

G interfered with services such as passenger guidance of victims by force, such as neglecting that G's dismissal over several times, avoiding disturbance, etc.

2. On August 10, 2015, Defendant A interfered with the victim’s service duties, such as passenger guidance, by force, by forcing the victim H, the head of the service team, from around 08:30 on August 10, 2015 to around 09:10 on the same ground as paragraph (1) in the same place as Paragraph (1).

[2015 High 2614] Defendant A, around 13:15 on September 24, 2015, expressed the complaints against the past days to the victim J (Y, 48 years old) at the center of “I” store located in Daegu-gu Daegu-E, and made a public insult of the victim before the end of approximately 2-3 minutes, such as “I am Mara, I am am ma, I am am am. I am am, I am am.”

Summary of Evidence

[2015 High Court Decision 2612]

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police officer;

1. The police of K.W.