The lower court maintained the judgment of the first instance court that found all of the facts charged of the instant case guilty.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the deception of fraud, deception, criminal intent, causal relationship, and intent of unlawful acquisition of occupational embezzlement, contrary

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.