The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the defendant guilty of violating the Political Fund Act, which is an ancillary charge added at the court below, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on exclusion of illegally collected evidence and admissibility of non-voluntary confession.

In addition, the ground of appeal that there is an error in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the violation of each political fund law around April 2012, 2012, the first patrol officer, around January 2013, the first patrol officer, and September 2013, and around September 2014, the lower court asserted that the Defendant’s ground of appeal or the lower court’s decision was not subject to a judgment ex officio, and thus, it is not a legitimate ground of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.