However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 4, 2014, at around 17:14, the Defendant interfered with funeral services by taking a bath for the merchants who sold a stuff in the street while under the influence of alcohol while taking a bath for them.

Accordingly, the police officer D, who was dispatched after receiving 112 report, voluntarily moved into the C District as well as D, and then, at the above D district, expressed that “n't be a police officer, who is not a police officer, and who is subject to a penalty disposition due to a violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act” in the above D, and expressed that “n't be a police officer, who is the only citizen who is not a police officer, or who is fl't be a police officer, fl's right face of the said D with the hand-on, thereby obstructing the police officer from performing his/her duties.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confessions and reflects);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;