도로교통법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the vehicle of the defendant was stopped for left-hand turn from the first vehicle line, which is the left-hand turn at the time indicated in the facts charged in this case, and the vehicle driving the second vehicle line is only when the vehicle of the defendant shocks the vehicle of the defendant. Thus, the change of course that hinders the passage of the defendant
subsection (b) of this section.
2. Article 19(3) of the Road Traffic Act provides that the driver of any motor vehicle shall not change course when it is likely to impede normal traffic of other motor vehicles running in the direction to which the driver intends to change course of the motor vehicle.
According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, it is recognized that the defendant stops on the first lane, the left-hand turn line, and entered the second lane, the straight line, and that the left part of the vehicle driving the second lane was shocked by the front part of the right part of the vehicle. Thus, the defendant is changing the course when it is likely to obstruct the normal passage of other vehicles.
Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is just, and the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.