Text

1. The Defendant has the executive force of the case No. 2015, 1131, Dongducheon-si District Court of the Republic of Korea against Nonparty B.

Reasons

1. Since movable property indicated in the attached list indicating the claim is owned by the plaintiff, it is unreasonable that the defendant seizes the above movable property by compulsory execution based on an executory payment order copy of the case No. 2015j. 20131 at the same time as the Jung-gu District Court on Nonparty B (Articles 208(3)1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act).