손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On October 26, 2017, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 120,400,000 (excluding value-added tax) to D in relation to the structural construction (i.e., ground-breaking, miscellaneous, miscellaneous, reticulator, steel dynamic assembly, strawing, external raining, retaining wall) among the construction of a new house for ground-based neighborhood living facilities in south-gu E-gu, Nam-gu, Seoul, to pay KRW 12,040,000 (excluding value-added tax) among the construction of a new house for land-based neighborhood living facilities. (ii) D agreed to pay KRW 6,755,00 (including retaining walls, such as type molds, site rearrangement, etc.) during the construction to F on October 30, 2017.
3) On December 12, 2017, the Plaintiff agreed to receive wages from F and provided labor on the construction site. (B) On December 17, 2017, the Plaintiff, as part of the molding work for the structural construction at the site of the instant construction project, brought down the work clothes from the first floor to the second floor of the instant construction project, and suffered from cutting down the left side bridge between the safety launch plate and the non-line pipe by getting out of 1.5 meters.
2) On December 18, 2018, the Plaintiff received sporadic sporadic sporadic sporadic spodic spodic spodic spodics and spodic spodics from G Hospital on the left-hand spodic spodics
2. The grounds for appeal Nos. 1 to 13, each of the testimony of the witness HD, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Although the Plaintiff did not specify “Article 757 of the Civil Act” as the cause of the claim by the Plaintiff under Article 750 or 757 of the Civil Act, the Plaintiff appears to have actually asserted this in light of the content of the preparatory brief dated August 13, 2019.
As a result of the compensation for damages, ① the reduction of lost income due to the loss of labor ability, ② the calculation process written out in the preparatory brief dated February 10, 202 of the Plaintiff’s KRW 40,852,640, ② the number of lost income as a convicted cater for the 287-day treatment period, ③ the sum of KRW 10,754,640, ③ the sum of KRW 43,683,200, which deducted the sum of the disability suspension benefits from KRW 86,754,640, ③ the sum of KRW 43,683,200, out of KRW 43,071,440, and KRW 40,97,090.