When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 15, 2017, the Defendant reported an advertisement to the victim E, “The above D vehicle was already sold,” which was located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B around 10:30,000 won.

In a similar situation and similar transfer of vehicles, the FI-30 automobiles show the car color of the vehicle, and the said FF vehicle’s price is KRW 21.8 million, and the said F vehicle’s sale and purchase contract stating that “the said F vehicle’s price is KRW 21.8 million, and KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.”

However, in fact, the above vehicle is not KRW 21.8 million, but KRW 14.5 million, and the defendant, as above, had expressed the vehicle's price in excess of the vehicle's price and had the intention to pay personal debts and to use it for living expenses.

As above, the Defendant was given KRW 22,200,000,000, out of the vehicle sale cost and registration cost by deceiving the victim as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the car transfer certificate, the counselor H and the complainant's Stockholm conversation details, false objects photographs, the amount statement received on the part of I, and the G admission and withdrawal transaction statement;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;