When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 21, 2016, the Defendant, at around 15:20 on April 21, 2016, got out of the above restaurant without paying the food cost after drinking in the “D cafeteria” operated by the injured party C (n, 56 years of age) (hereinafter “D cafeteria”).

Therefore, when the injured person requests the calculation, he/she will not obtain approval by presenting a loss card, and will not calculate it. He/she has collected a cream packed in the plastic box, such as putting 7 fireworks in the floor of the cafeteria which was placed in the cafeteria stairs, and putting it up, and he/she will not calculate.

26 66 66 144

"Along with the fact that the market value, which is the property of the victim, was damaged by 7 parts of the unsatisfying, such as dynasty, and satisfying customers in the eating room, and at the same time interfere with the victim's restaurant business

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment toCCTV);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.