The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (2 million won by fine, 3,594,00 won by additional collection) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the court below recognized the defendant's mistake when the defendant was in the trial, and there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant has no criminal records, in addition to the punishment imposed once as a fine for violating the Labor Standards Act. However, the defendant actively advertised and sold E containing harmful substances, thereby causing danger to the people's health. There is no change in the circumstances that may be considered in sentencing newly after the sentence of the court below, and there is no change in the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is recognized that the sentence of the court below is appropriate.
Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.