Even if examining the relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts constituting the crime in the first instance judgment on the grounds stated in its reasoning, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the admissibility of evidence in the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the prosecutor, the status of resistance in the crime of forced indecent act corresponding to the crime of quasi-rape, the acceptance of the crime of quasi-rape, or by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, or by omitting the judgment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.