If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. Interference with business;

A. On January 20, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business by force, such as having the victim gather, on the ground that the victim did not sell alcoholic beverages to himself/herself, at the D Park E shop located in Busan, which is operated by the victim B, on January 2012.

B. On February 2012, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s work by force, such as breaging the victim a mountain mountain, on the same ground at the same place as the foregoing paragraph (a).

2. The Defendant damaged the property by putting the lateral glass managed by the victim in hand at the same time and place as the above 1-A, and at the same time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (Attachment of photographs);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;