If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 2016, the Defendant became aware of the fact that C had sexual intercourse with the victim D(47), which was introduced by the Defendant on the early 2016, and received money from the Defendant.

C It is an offense against the victim’s intent to photograph sexually related videos in multiple times at a place where it is difficult to know from December 26, 2016 to February 1, 2017.

A male-friendly Gu in the native Gu is Daegu 1st, and it is sent KRW 6 million immediately before the width of the denied test relationship.

different types.

“A diagnosis was conducted as a sexual disease,” but the treatment cost, etc. changed to KRW 4 million. At the inside of the State, it shall be reported as a sex offense and sent to the denied Kakakao Stockholm.

I would like to draw up a letter that “20 million won has been stamped by mutual agreement on sexual intercourse video at the face of deposit.”

If the deposit is known, a letter shall be sent to the denial.

“The message sent the message,” etc.

Accordingly, the victims of frightage transferred C the amount of KRW 6 million on December 27, 2016, KRW 4 million on January 27, 2017, KRW 1 million on February 1, 2017, and KRW 1 million on February 2, 2017.

From December 26, 2016 to January 2017, the Defendant, in order to assist the Defendant’s attack as seen above C, did not put the text message to be sent to the victim “on the ground that the Defendant did not lose it, so the Defendant was frightened by the director of the hospital at the bar, and a person living under the bottom of the floor of the hospital.

Along with the fact that internal bankruptcy procedures are being carried out, it would be said that it would be negligible for him to draw up or modify it.

In addition, the victim was prevented from receiving C's phone number, and the defendant received a cell phone message to send C with a cellular phone and sent it again to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was able to defend by facilitating C's attack crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect with regard to C;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Complaint;

1.Each.