If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant and the victim C(the age of 43) are members of the "E" in Suwon-si D.

At around 11:20 on October 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was placed in a G bus operated in E running on the front road of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant called the Defendant to open the door to the blank so that the Defendant would open the seat immediately after the entrance, and the victim who was seated on the spacking side of the string.

The defendant has sexual intercourse with the victim, and has a dispute with him.

The victim's grandchildren, etc., quizzle, quizzle, head knife, and skele, which require medical treatment for 14 days to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements among the police interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to death diagnosis documents attached to investigation reports (general-suspect C accompanying documents);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion regarding the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. The defendant's act did not inflict any injury on the victim as stated in its reasoning and the defendant's act constituted self-defense because it was against the victim's attack, and thus constitutes self-defense. Thus, according to the above evidence, the defendant's act can be acknowledged as having been injured by the victim as stated in its reasoning. The above defendant's act has the nature of active act, not mere defense, and it cannot be viewed as self