However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 22:00 on March 29, 2017, the Defendant thought that the victim D (29 aged) who was under the age of the Defendant would ignore the Defendant when calculating the drinking value, and that he would be able to say that he would not ignore the Defendant, and that “the victim would not be able to frighten from the fright, I would like to see the victim’s face.” The victim would be able to see the part of the victim’s face by drinking, and the beer who was a dangerous object on the mebble, and the part of the victim’s face was collected once by putting about three weeks of the victim’s face on one occasion, and caused the victim’s injury, such as the removal of the bones bones, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against E or D;

1. Application of reports on occurrence (Assault), reports on injury, and statutes governing field photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Considerations, such as those agreed with the victim);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;