The council of occupants' representatives was promoting urban gas installation projects, and some residents of the above apartment, such as urban gas E, have formed an organization "F" for the same purpose. A.

On May 4, 2012, the Defendants ordered the above “F” to remove the banner “F”, which was posted on the said apartment complex with the consent of Defendant A, around April 24, 2012. G and H removed the banner. Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to remove the banner owned by “F” and interfered with F’s urban gas promotion business by force. (2) On May 22, 2012, the Defendants: (a) around May 21, 2012, the above apartment management office G and the security guard G and I to remove the “F” to the above apartment management office G and I, and (b) to remove the “F” bulletined in the bulletin board board, which was attached to the above apartment building 4 Dong-dong, 6, and 6, and at the same time, to the residents’ meeting, and (c) to remove the “F” bulletined in accordance with G’s order. < Amended by Act No. 11483, May 21, 2012>

As a result, the Defendants conspired to damage a notice, which is a property owned by the F, and interfered with the F’s urban gas promotion business by force.

3. On May 23, 2012, the Defendants instructed H of the above apartment security guards to remove the notice of the holding of the residents’ meeting, i.e., “F’s meeting to promote urban gas” posted on the above apartment, and the notice of the holding of the residents’ meeting to promote urban gas by mail of 295 households. Accordingly, H removed the above notice and mail.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to post a notice, which is a property owned by the F, and the head of each apartment.