1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. The Defendant, while working as the person in charge of the former Dan Chang Construction, received the seal from the injured party who operates the manpower office and at the same time received the daily allowances to be reduced from the injured party and delivered it to the injured party, and the injured party subsequently received the human resources expenses directly from the above D Construction Company, by using the fact that the injured party received the said D Construction Company’s direct payment of the human resources expenses. As if the part who did not work for the purpose of using food expenses and other living expenses was completed, the Defendant was able to falsely prepare a daily labor situation list and receive money from the injured

On July 30, 2015, the Defendant, at the “F” human resource office operated by the injured party in Mapo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E, deceiving the injured party by means of preparing a false daily labor status table in the above way.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) received from the victim, from August 27, 2015, a total of 4.92 million won from the victim to August 27, 2015 as the daily allowance of the father who did not work.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On September 11, 2015, the Defendant deceptioned the victim as if he did not have any money during the time, and because there was no intention or ability to pay human resources expenses because of economic difficulties, at the above office.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim from the victim, provided 33 persons from the victim to October 14, 2015, from the time on which he/she belonged with 33 persons from the time to the time of the damage, and did not pay the total sum of 3.3 million won (10 million won x 333 persons) and the transportation cost of 4.8 million won.

Accordingly, the defendant had acquired property benefits equivalent to the above money by deceiving the victim.

2. On November 4, 2015, the criminal defendant against the victim G is obliged to pay money even if he/she borrowed money from the I office that was operated by the victim of the damage who suffered from J in Seo-jin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around November 4, 2015.