대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that between June 15, 2005 and August 30, 2005, the Plaintiff loaned KRW 70 million in total to the Defendant and C as business funds for multi-stage projects.
2. In the judgment, there is no dispute between the parties that the defendant's seal affixed to Gap's No. 1 (Receipt) is based on the defendant's seal, but on the other hand, Eul has affixed the defendant's seal to the above receipt. Thus, it is insufficient to recognize the fact that Eul has the right to affix the defendant's seal to Eul, and unless there is any other evidence to acknowledge it, the above No. 1 cannot be used as evidence, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion, and the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.
3. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.