When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From April 16, 2016, the Defendant joined the “D” office, an illegal Internet gambling site, using the Defendant’s mobile phone, and deposited KRW 900,000,000 to the business account of the above site, and charged the game money.

Since then, the Defendant, among the numbers of 0 to 9, shooted in one place among “ro” in which the number between 0 to 4 is drawn from the original books and the number of 5 to 9 is drawn, or a “raber” in which the number is drawn, and 20,000 won is displayed on the “malball game” in which dividends are paid according to the prescribed dividend rate, and then gambled, from that time to April 25, 2017, the Defendant deposited KRW 243,100,000 in total over 386 times, such as the attached list of “crime sight”.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stuffed the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A investigation report (for example, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8);

1. Habitualness of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the total amount of gold, frequency of crimes, repetition of the same kind of crime, etc. in the judgment;

1. Article 246(2) and Article 246(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime (the selection of a punishment - the frequency of gambling and the amount of money, etc. shall be comprehensively taken into account in light of the fact that there is no record of the same punishment, or circumstances, such as the details of the crime and the degree of reflectivity, shown in the records and pleadings);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;